Is that the shaft you think it is?


Hi Reader,

🏌️‍♂️ Same name does not always mean the same shaft

You find a driver with a familiar shaft name. You’ve seen it in a Tour player’s bag, or read a glowing review, and assume you know what you’re getting.

​Zomma Golf’s look at stock shafts raises a useful point: a shaft supplied with a club (a 'made for' shaft) can share a name with an 'aftermarket' version while having different specifications.

  • Aftermarket simply means a shaft sold separately, often through a fitter.
  • A “made-for” shaft is a version produced for a club manufacturer.

Those descriptions tell you about the product, but they don’t tell you which will suit your golf.

Fujikura - the most used driver, fairway wood and hybrid shaft among the top 100 PGA Tour pros - provides a concrete example.

​Its own guidance says that not every VENTUS shaft contains VeloCore technology. To identify one that does, look for the VeloCore or VeloCore+ logo near the tip, down towards the clubhead.

The VENTUS name alone doesn’t settle it.

That distinction is worth knowing when you’re comparing a review, a fitting recommendation or the club sitting in front of you.

But it would be a mistake to turn this into another reason every golfer needs an expensive upgrade.

​Mitsubishi Golf explains that its shafts made for club manufacturers are designed for a broad range of golfers. They may have fewer technologies than its premium aftermarket models, but Mitsubishi says it still tests them for consistent performance.

In our earlier newsletter on the shafts used by 100 PGA Tour pros, we looked beyond flex to shaft weight. This adds another detail to that equipment decision: the exact version you’re buying.

So if you're looking at a new club, write down the full shaft model, weight and flex. If a review helped you choose it, check that the review tested that same version.

Then compare how it performs for you against the standard option. A different construction gives you something to test. Pay extra only if the results give you a reason to!

🌬️ Even scratch golfers pay a price into the wind

A well-struck approach finishes short into a stiff breeze. How harshly should you judge it?

​Lou Stagner’s latest analysis puts some numbers on how much harder those conditions make the game.

Using Arccos data, he compared the average strokes golfers needed to finish a hole from the same distance in calm conditions and into a headwind.

For scratch golfers from 140 to 180 yards, a strong headwind meant around 0.15 extra strokes to hole out. His strongest wind band was 15 to 19mph; the calm comparison was 4mph or less.

That’s an average across those situations, rather than a penalty to add to every windy hole on your scorecard.

We’ve explored the distance side of this in our guide to how weather affects golf ball distance, covering wind alongside altitude, temperature and humidity. Lou’s analysis adds the scoring cost.

Together, they’re a useful reminder to judge your approach play fairly against the conditions you faced.

And this is especially for those us heading into more challenging weather months.

Even scratch golfers need more shots from those distances into a strong breeze!

Thanks for reading and as ever and most importantly enjoy your golf!

Play well until next time 👍

Graeme Hay

Founder, GolfingFocus.com

Golfing Focus Limited, 73 Maple Road, London, KT6 4AG
​Unsubscribe · Preferences​

Golfing Focus

Golf isn’t easy and life is busy. So at GolfingFocus.com our focus is simple. We spend the time you don’t have researching the game and the gear to leave you free to simply enjoy playing and improving your golf! Whether you are a beginner just taking up the game or have been playing for a long time there’s something at Golfing Focus for you! So a big welcome and please do subscribe. It helps us help more regular golfers like you enjoy their golf more and hopefully get better at the same time!

Read more from Golfing Focus
Golf Course along Colorado river in Austin Texas

Fully Focused On YOUR Golf Hi Reader, ⛳ Does this hole really need a draw? Water left. Start it right and draw it back. Sounds sensible. But what if your fade is much more reliable? Adam Young’s latest example illustrates why the shape alone can’t make that decision for you. He places different shot patterns over the same hole, then adjusts their aim. The tighter fade produces a better projected score than the wider draw, even though some fades miss the intended shape. Tighten the draw...

Fully Focused On YOUR Golf Hi Reader, ⛳ Never up, never in. But then what? Your 20-foot putt stops a foot short. Frustrating? Of course. But would you rather be six feet past? “Never up, never in” is 100% 'technically' true. It’s just not a good way judge the putt. Lou Stagner’s latest analysis looked at five years of PGA Tour data. From 20 to 24 feet, 26% of putts finished short. From 30 to 34 feet, it was 40%. From 45 to 49 feet, it was 49%. That’s almost half from longer range, even among...

What hybrids should you carry?

Fully Focused On YOUR Golf Hi Reader, 🏌️♂️ Which hybrids belong in your bag? If your longest iron rarely produces the shot you want, a hybrid deserves a look. And the latest release isn’t the only place to start. GOLF’s Jack Hirsh reports that Austin Smotherman won the recent Bank of Utah Championship carrying a TaylorMade SIM Max 3-hybrid from 2020. Last week we linked our club-replacement guide. And right here’s a timely example of an older club still earning its place even at a time when...